The ABC News 21 August 2015 11:00am told of the application
being made to UNESCO to have the Owen Stanley Range in New Guinea listed as
World Heritage. The argument was that such a listing would ‘preserve the
natural qualities of the region.’
The burning of the World Heritage National Park by National Parks Queensland
Apparently this was to be 'a one metre high burn'
Apparently this was to be 'a one metre high burn'
Photograph by Greg Kernagan
The burnt area seen from the Canyon Lookout
The walk through the ashes
The recent activity by the National Parks rangers at
Springbrook National Park in Queensland, an area that is part of the Gondwana
Rainforests of Australia World Heritage Area, seems to suggest otherwise. The
rangers have transformed beautiful rocky heath areas into a mass of black and
grey ash. They argue that it is a ‘controlled burn.’ But why should World
Heritage areas be burned? What particular ‘natural quality’ is being preserved?
What diversity is being enhanced?
Only shades of grey diversity remain
A new path was cut through the World Heritage bushland to provide access for the burning
Indeed, what particular qualities are being lost? In a
region in which new species are regularly being discovered, how do the rangers
know that no unknown species of flora or fauna is being destroyed? This is an
area listed for its biodiversity. Why destroy this? Why burn for the benefit of
the heath alone, as has been argued, when the ecosystem is much more varied
and complex than any singular concern for the health and prosperity of just one
species of flora might suggest?
'Offending' World Heritage bushland had to be burned?
'After' on the left; 'before' on the right
Why fight for one species at the cost of all others? These
fires are being promoted and managed by rangers who seem to be more bush
handymen than environmental scientists, yet they choose to promote burning as
though they know all. They even, so it appears, know better than nature.
The shrubs, grasses, mosses, orchids and lichen were all destroyed
Let’s hope that the Owen Stanley Range fares better than
this.
World Heritage scar: scare!
Why?
World Heritage bald rocks, ashes and charred branches
The charred World Heritage remains
The aftermath
All photographs not accredited are by the author
Lest we forget
Surely World Heritage deserves better than this?